The study investigates the relationship between the Price-Earnings multiple and the scrip returns in India. A sample size of 80 companies comprising of 8 different industries listed in Bombay Stock Exchange were taken up for a time period of 08 years from January 1st, 2001 to December 31st, 2008. Rather than a single holding period, the study considers multiple holding periods ranging from six months to four years. Eight different portfolios were constructed on the basis of the price-earnings of the scrips and their returns were compared. The study finds an inverse relationship between the price-earnings multiple and scrip returns, which levers up as the duration of the holding period increases. The variability of the scrip returns is explained to a greater extent by the linear relationship between the price-earnings and scrip returns during relatively longer holding periods (two to four years). It is also identified that the annualized returns of the low price-earnings based portfolios (value stocks) are greater than the high price-earnings based portfolios (glamour stocks) and the paired t test confirmed that the holding period duration of four or three years instead of six months or one year earn significantly higher annualized returns.

1. Aras, G; Yilmaz, M,K. (2008), “Price Earnings Ratio, Dividend Yield And Market To Book Ratio To Predict Return On Stock Market: Evidence From Emerging Market.” Journal of Global Business and Technology, Vol.4, No.1, Spring, pp. 21-30.
2. Basu S (1977), "Investment Performance of Common Stocks in Relation to Their Price-Earning Ratios: A Test of the Efficient Market Hypothsis", Journal of Finance, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 663-682.
3. Bhargava V, Malhotra D K, (2006), “Do price-earnings ratios drive stock values?” The Journal of Portfolio Management, Autumn, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 86-93.
4. Campbell, John Y. and Robert J. Shiller (1998), .Valuation Ratios and the Long-Run Stock Market Outlook., Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 11-26.
5. Dreman, D.N. (1998), Contrarian Investment Strategies: the Next Generation, Simon & Schuster, New York, pp. 265-98.
6. Fisher, K.L., and Statman, M. (2000), “Cognitive Biases in Market Forecasts.” The Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 27, Fall, pp. 72-81.
7. Fuller, R.J., Huberts, L.C. 7 Levinson, M.J., (1993), “Returns to E/P strategies, Higgeldy Piggeldy Growth, Analysts' Forecast errors, and Omitted risk Factors.” Journal of Portfolio management, 1993, winter: pp.13-34.
8. Guler Aras And Mustafa Kemal Yilmaz (2008), “Price-Earnings Ratio, Dividend Yield, And Market-To-Book Ratio To Predict Return On Stock Market: Evidence From The Emerging Markets.” Journal of Global Business and Technology, Volume. 4, Number 1, pp.105-112.
9. Gupta, SP., (1994), Statistical Methods, Sultan Chand & Sons, New Delhi, pp. E10.1-61.
10. Levis, M. (1989), “Stock Market Anomalies”. Journal of Banking and Finance, Volume.13 (SI), pp. 675-96.
11. Lo, A. [Ed.], (1996), Market Efficiency: Stock Market Behaviour in Theory and Practice, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., London, pp. 326-93.
12. Nicholson, S.F., (1960), “Price-Earning Ratios.” Financial Analysts Journal, 16(4): pp. 43-45.
13. Oppenheimer, H. (1984), “A Test of Ben Graham's stock Selection criteria.” Financial Analyst Journal, September- October, pp. 27-36.
14. Park, S., (2000), “What does the P-E ratio Mean?” The Journal of Investing, Vol.9, Fall, pp. 45-56.