The export-led growth strategy adopted in the aftermath of the economic crisis of 1991 has removed all sorts of bias against exports. In this context, this paper examined the export performance and its determinants during the period from 1981-2011. The export growth has been higher in the post reform period as compared to the pre - liberalization period. The higher trade GDP ratio indicates that the Indian economy is more deeply integrated with the world economy. However, declining export-import ratio reflecting a deteriorating trade balance has been a cause of concern for the country. An ARDL bound testing approach to cointegration was adopted to identify the determinants of export performance. The empirical results indicated a long run as well as short run relation between the exports and the GDP, income of foreign countries (FGDP), real and effective exchange rate (REER), trade liberalization index (TLI), and foreign direct investment (FDI). While the impact of RGDP, TLI, and REER were positive; the impact of FGDP and FDI were found to be negative. The policy implication of the negative effect of the FGDP is that the government should take initiatives to improve the quality of local products and should reduce the average cost of production to increase the share of Indian exports in the world market. To realize the advantage of FDI for export growth, the government should provide infrastructural facilities and remove all barriers to attract more export oriented FDI, as is the case with China and Singapore.

1. Government of India (2010). Economic Survey 2009-10. Ministry of Finance, Department of Economic Affairs, Economic Division (p. 155). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
2. Government of India (2012). Economic Survey 2011 -12. Ministry of Finance, Department of Economic Affairs, Economic Division, Oxford University Press (p. 155) New Delhi : Oxford University Press.
3. Kaundal, R. K (2007). Economic reforms and their impact on the external sector of India. In R.K. Kaundal. (Ed.). Economic reforms & the Indian economy (pp. 81-117). New Delhi : Mahamaya Publishing House.
4. Pesaran, M. H., Yongcheol, S., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16 (3), 289-326.
5. Prasanna, N. (2011). Foreign direct investment and manufactured export performance in India. Indian Journal of Finance, 5 (1), 42 - 48.
6. Sharma, O.P (1996). Performance, policy issues and prospects of India's exports. Economic and Political Weekly, 31 (41-42), 2817- 2822.
7. Srinivasan, T. N. (1998). India's export performance: A comparative analysis. In I. J. Ahluwalia & I. M. D. Little (Ed). India's economic reforms and development essays for Manmohan Singh (p. 213). Delhi : Oxford University Press.
8. Saksena, K.D. (2008). Economic reforms: The Indian experience (p. 321). Delhi: Shipra Publication.
9. Shahbaz, M. (2010). Income inequality - economic growth and non-linearity: A case of Pakistan. International Journal of Social Economics, 37 (8), 613-736.
10. Sharma, K. (2000). Export Growth in India: Has FDI played a role? Yale University Discussion Paper No.816, pp.1-21.
11. Tyagi, R., & Jain, S. (2008). India's foreign trade: Post reform period. In B. Aggarwal (Ed.). Economic Reforms in India: An Overview (p. 203). Jaipur: ABD Publishers.
12. UNCTAD. (2002). World Investment Report, 2002 (p. 151). New York and Geneva : United Nations.
13. UNCTAD. (2012). Unctad Stats .Retrieved from <a href=www.unctadstat.unctd.org/ target="_blank">www.unctadstat.unctd.org/</a>
14. Virmani, A. (2003). India's external reforms - modest globalization, significant gains. Economic and Political Weekly, 38 (32), 3373-90.