New IJF now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member
Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE |
Indian Journal of Finance logo

Indian Journal of Finance

ISSN: 0973-8711 Frequency: Monthly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 2007 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE Group II Google Scholar J-Gate NISCAIR Crossref

Original Article

Open Access Original Article

Measurement of Loss Aversion Behavior Under Prospect Theory: Comparison of Various Kinds of Individuals

Mu-Lan Wang1,  Hung-Hsi Huang2,  Shu-Hui Ho3

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Finance and Risk Management, Ling-Tung University of Technology, No. 1, Ling-Tung Rd., Taichung City, 408

2 Professor, Department of Banking and Finance, National Chiayi University, 580 Sinmin Road, Chiayi City 60054, Taiwan

3 MBA student, Graduate Institute of Finance, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, No. 1, Shuefu Rd. Neipu, Pingtung County 912

Volume 7
Issue 9
Pages 5–15
Year 2013
Received: May 5, 2013 Accepted: June 22, 2013 Published: Sept. 1, 2013
Abstract

This paper designs a binary prospect questionnaire according to previous literature for extracting the certainty equivalents of gains and losses prospects. Individual utility function is defined by the power utility function, in which the gain power parameter and loss power parameter are estimated by the least squares method. The respondents for the present study comprised of 20 common people, 20 MBA students, and 20 financial workers, and the main findings are as follows. First, individuals revealed risk averse attributes for gains and losses, but the risk averse magnitude for gains was larger than it was for losses. Second, the individual utility function is likely concave. Third, relative to others, the financial workers were less loss averse. Finally, women were generally more loss averse than men.

Keywords Prospect Theory Loss Aversion Utility Measurement
How to Cite

Mu-Lan Wang, Hung-Hsi Huang, Shu-Hui Ho (2013). Measurement of Loss Aversion Behavior Under Prospect Theory: Comparison of Various Kinds of Individuals. Indian Journal of Finance, 7(9), 5–15.

References
  1. Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H., & Paraschiv, C. (2007). Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement. Management Science, 53 (10), 1659-1674.
  2. Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt H. & L'Haridon, O. (2008). A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospcet theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 36 (3), 245-266.
  3. Brooks, P., & Zank, H. (2005). Loss averse behavior. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 31 (3), 301-325.
  4. Dimmock, S.G., & Kouwenberg, R. (2010). Loss-aversion and household Portfolio Choice. Journal of Empirical Finance, 17 (3), 441-459.
  5. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47 (2), 263-292.
  6. Levy, M. (2010). Loss aversion and the price of risk. Quantitative Finance, 10 (9), 1009-1022. DOI:10.1080/14697680903059416.
  7. Mehta, S.K., & Aggarwal, N. (2011). The effect of demographics on investment choice: An empirical study of investors in Jammu. Indian Journal of Finance, 5 (10), 43-55.
  8. Odean, T. (1998). Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? Journal of Finance, 53 (5), 1775-1798. DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00072.
  9. Shefrin, H. & Statman, M. (1985). The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: Theory and evidence. Journal of Finance, 40 (3), 777-790, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb05002.x.
  10. Singh, R. & Bhowal, A. (2009). Risk perception dynamics and equity share investment behaviour. Indian Journal of Finance, 3 (6), 23-30.
  11. Thaler, R.H. (1980). Towards a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1 (1), 39-60.
  12. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5 (4), 297-323.
  13. Weber, M. & Camerer, C.F. (1998). The disposition effect in securities trading: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Behavion and Organization, 33 (2), 167-184.
Editorial Scholar

Submit your Research to IJF

Submit your Manuscript → Author Guidelines