Purpose: The present study attempted to compare the performance of 25 major states in India concerning their infrastructure output. To provide an accurate picture, the infrastructure investment and output of each state were compared using sophisticated analysis to determine the true productivity of the Indian states.

Methodology: Principal component analysis was used for raw analysis of panel data from 25 Indian states, while ordinary least square regression was used for refined analysis. The fields of electricity, building, transportation, and communication were examined in this study conducted in India.

Findings: In raw analysis, states like Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh, and Karnataka performed well, and states like Goa and north-eastern states like Mizoram, Tripura, Manipur, Nagaland were poor performers. However, after a refined analysis, the actual laggards identified were Jammu and Kashmir, Jharkhand, Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh, Haryana, etc. While these states found it difficult to get off the ground despite receiving significant infrastructure funding, the performance of places such as Goa and other northeastern states significantly improved following the more thorough investigation.Practical

Implications: The development of India is concerned with the gap in infrastructure between its states. It was advised that policymakers identify the states whose productivity is below par and come up with strategies to elevate them in order to address this.Originality/

Value: The productivity of Indian states in the infrastructure sector has only been empirically studied in a few studies. It was a fresh notion to analyze infrastructure productivity using both raw and refined information, with infrastructure investment serving as a yardstick, in contrast to previous studies.

1. Agarwalla, A. (2011). Estimating the contribution of infrastructure in regional productivity growth in India (Working Paper No. 2011-05-01). Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad. https://www.iima.ac.in/sites/default/files/rnpfiles/10162392592011-05-01.pdf
2. Bajar, S., & Rajeev, M. (2016). Contribution of infrastructure to output growth in India. Emerging Economy Studies, 2(2), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/2394901516661093
3. Bhandari, P. (2013). Refining state level comparisons in India (Working Paper Series 2012). Planning Commission, Government of India.
4. Bhatnagar, G., & Sharma, S. (2016). Inter-state disparities in higher education: Affecting economic development in India. Arthshastra Indian Journal of Economics & Research, 5(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2016/v5i1/87838
5. Bordoloi, R. (2014). Formulation and implementation of government policies and programmes with reference to Assam. Arthshastra Indian Journal of Economics & Research, 3(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2014/v3i1/55963
6. Jose, A. (2019). India's regional disparity and its policy responses. Journal of Public Affairs, 19(4), e1933. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1933
7. Kumar, S. (2015). Regional disparities in per capita GSDP/NSDP in the seven sister states in India: Convergence and divergence. Arthshastra Indian Journal of Economics & Research, 4(2), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2015/v4i2/65544
8. Longe, J. B., & Omozuawo, M. B. (2013). The management and adequacy of road infrastructure expenditure for economic growth in Nigeria. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 6(6), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2013/v6i6/60001
9. Madan, P. (2014). Foreign direct investment: Governance and infrastructure - A study across Indian states. Arthshastra Indian Journal of Economics & Research, 3(4), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2014/v3i4/55984
10. Malik, S., & Kaur, S. (2021). Rationales and advantages of financing infrastructure through public – private partnerships: A systematic literature review. Indian Journal of Finance, 15(10), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2021/v15i10/166510
11. Mishra, A. K., Narendra, K., & Kar, B. P. (2013). Growth and infrastructure investment in India: Achievements, challenges, and opportunities. Economic Annuals, 58(196), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.2298/EKA1396051M
12. Mundle, S., Chowdhury, S., & Sikdar, S. (2016). Governance Performance of Indian States: 2001-02 and 2011-12 (Working Paper No. 164). National Institute of Public Finance and Policy. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3855.0646
13. Narayan, L. (2015). Inter-district disparities in health in Haryana. Arthshastra Indian Journal of Economics & Research, 4(5), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2015/v4i5/82901
14. Oda, H. (2011). Infrastructure, economic growth and interstate disparity in India. In H. Oda, & Y. Tsujita (eds.), Inclusiveness in India: A strategy for growth and equality (pp. 35–61). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230304956_2
15. Raichoudhury, A. (2020). Major determinants of financial inclusion: State-level evidences from India. Vision, 24(2), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262920923882
16. Sahoo, B. K., & Acharya, D. (2012). Constructing macroeconomic performance index of Indian states using DEA. Journal of Economic Studies, 39(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443581211192116
17. Saji, T. G. (2016). Recession to resilience: The Indian experience in a regional perspective. Arthshastra Indian Journal of Economics & Research, 5(5), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2016/v5i5/105146
18. Sharma, C. (2018). Inequality of opportunity and economic performance: Empirical evidence from Indian states. Available at SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3184427
19. Unnikrishnan, N., & Kattookaran, T. P. (2020). Impact of public and private infrastructure investment on economic growth: Evidence from India. Journal of Infrastructure Development, 12(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974930620961477
20. Vidyarthi, H. (2017). Banking outreach, infrastructure development, and regional growth: Empirical evidence from Indian states. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 13(2), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJEMSD-11-2016-0054