The objective of this technical analysis study was to test the profitability of 80 related trend following algorithms applied to closing prices for India's Nifty index over periods of rising, falling, mixed trend, and nearly trendless markets. Daily closing prices for the Nifty index were divided into four periods covering trading days from 2005 through 2012. Trend following rules were used that employed no leverage and no short positions. Only investments in the Nifty index or in cash at India's MIBOR rate were permitted with no transaction costs or dividends assumed. For each period, all 80 related trend following algorithms were statistically examined for significance against return distributions created using a Levich-Thomas bootstrapping process. We conclude from this technical analysis study that the family of 80 algorithms investigated worked well in a sharply declining market, but far less so, or not at all well in markets that were more gradually rising, mixed trend, or nearly trendless.

1. Kakani, R. K., & Sundhar, S. (2006). Profiting from technical analysis in Indian equity markets. SSRN. Retrieved from <a href=http://ssrn.com/abstract=889515 target="_blank">http://ssrn.com/abstract=889515</a>
2. Levich, R. M., & Thomas, L. R. (1991). The significance of technical trading - Rule profits in the foreign exchange market: A bootstrap approach. Cambridge: NBER Working Paper No. 3818, 1-25.
3. Mitra, S. K. (2002). Profiting from technical analysis in Indian stock market. Finance India, 13 (1),109-120.
4. Ratner, M., & Leal, R. P. (1999). Tests of technical trading strategies in the emerging equity markets of Latin America and Asia. Journal of Banking and Finance, 23 (12), 1887-1905. DOI : <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(99)00042-4 target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(99)00042-4</a>
5. Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2 (1), 21-33.