Purpose: This study presented a systematic review of academic research conducted on the Indian mutual fund industry (IMFI). Our objective of this review was to present the academic researchers’ perspectives on the fastest-growing preferred investment avenue of the Indian financial system.Design/Methodology/Approach : The study adopted a systematic review approach and selected two verticals of academic research; the first one in the form of doctoral dissertations, and the other is the research articles published in academic journals. Doctoral dissertations between 2000 – 2022 were extracted from Shodhganga (the digital repository of the University Grants Commission), and research articles were extracted from the Scopus database.

Findings: A comprehensive review conclusion was drawn from this study, which concluded that the IMFI is growing exponentially in T30 and B30 cities (T30 and B30 cities are geographical segmentations made by SEBI and AMFI based on AUM, T30 means top 30 Indian cities contributing maximum AUM and B30 are beyond T30 cities). We reviewed 374 doctoral dissertations for this study; 83 dissertations were submitted during the first decade of the 20th century. State-level universities have produced a higher number of dissertations than central and deemed universities. Based on the dissertations’ titles, we classified dissertations into four categories of themes. The first theme is the marketing mechanism used by mutual funds to promote their mutual fund schemes, where we found the minimum number of theses; the comparative study is the second theme; here, we found that the comparison was made at various levels. The third and most interesting theme is investors’ perspectives on mutual fund investments. The maximum number of doctoral dissertations was carried out on the theme of performance evaluation. In the second vertical, we extracted 69 research articles published in 13 journals, and finally, 10 articles with a minimum of five citations were reviewed. We found no correlation between the research papers published in the Scopus database to the completed dissertations.Practical

Implications: The probable stakeholders of this study are future academic researchers in the same field. For them, this study is a systematic framework that can provide a basis for future research gap analysis. Academic institutions are another stakeholder ; the important stakeholder is IMFI, where institutional policymakers can formulate strategies for their future mutual fund schemes.

1. Alamelu, K. (2020). Investors' perception towards mutual funds with special reference to Madurai district (Doctoral Dissertation, Mother Teresa Women's University). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/335482
2. Ashok, R. (2020). Investor perception towards mutual fund investments in Chennai City (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Madras). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/345306
3. Bhadoria, P. (2021). Performance evaluation of mutual fund industry with special reference to tax saving schemes (Doctoral Dissertation, Jiwaji University). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/350724
4. Bhargava, R. (2015). Market sentiments and performance evaluation of equity mutual fund schemes in India (Doctoral Dissertation, Maharshi Dayanand University). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/302520
5. Bishnoi, J. K. (2017). A comparative study of mutual funds in India with special reference to nationalised banks and private sector banks (Doctoral Dissertation, Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Rohilkhand University). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/326952
6. Chakraborty, S. (2014). A study of retail investors' perception influencing the investment decision on mutual fund schemes (Doctoral Dissertation, Utkal University). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/118663
7. Chawla, D. (2014). An empirical analysis of factors influencing investment in mutual funds in India. Global Business Review, 15(3), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150914535136
8. Dave, M. N. (2014). A study of investors' perceptions on mutual funds (Doctoral Dissertation, Saurashtra University). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/144395
9. Davis, J., Mengersen, K., Bennett, S., & Mazerolle, L. (2014). Viewing systematic reviews and meta-analysis in social research through different lenses. SpringerPlus, 3, Article 511. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-511
10. Deb, S. G., Banerjee, A., & Chakrabarti, B. B. (2007). Market timing and stock selection ability of mutual funds in India: An empirical investigation. Vikalpa, 32(2), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090920070204
11. Deb, S. G. (2019). Persistence in performance of actively managed equity mutual funds: New Indian evidence. IIMB Management Review, 31(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2019.03.014
12. Garg, M. (2014). A study of performance evaluation of selected mutual funds in India (Doctoral Dissertation, Maharishi Markandeshwar University). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/17475
13. George, S. (2017). Study on the perception and behavior of retail investors towards mutual fund investment - A study among mutual fund investors in Cochin (Doctoral Dissertation, Cochin University of Science and Technology). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/231870
14. Gowri, M., & Deo, M. (2016). Performance evaluation of equity oriented growth and dividend funds of mutual funds in India: An application of risk-adjusted theoretical parameters. Indian Journal of Finance, 10(8), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2016/v10i8/99319
15. Gowri, M. (2018). Performance evaluation of fund of mutual funds in the Indian mutual fund industry (Doctoral Dissertation, Pondicherry University). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/257242
16. Hymavathi, C., & Koneru, K. (2019). Role of perceived risk in mutual funds selection behavior: An analysis among the selected mutual fund investors. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), 8(4), 1913–1920. https://www.ijeat.org/wpcontent/ uploads/papers/v8i4/D7017048419.pdf
17. Kale, J. R., & Panchapagesan, V. (2012). Indian mutual fund industry : Opportunities and challenges. IIMB Management Review, 24(4), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2012.05.004
18. Kerinab, B. (2014). A study on the investment behavior of Chennai investors in mutual fund schemes. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 9(22), 7520– 7525.
19. Krishnan, A. (2019, November 20). Five changes that have transformed your mutual funds. Value Research Online. https://www.valueresearchonline.com/stories/47536/five-changesthat- have-transformed-your-mutual-funds/
20. Kumar, S. (2017). Marketing of mutual fund schemes a study with special reference to retail investors (Doctoral Dissertation, Chaudhary Devi Lal University). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/247059
21. Mahajan, P. (2017). A comparative study of index mutual funds and exchange traded funds in India (Doctoral Dissertation, Kumaun University). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/206968
22. Mathews, E. (2011). Analysis of mutual funds growth performance and individual investor investment behaviour (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Madras). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/17475
23. Mishra, S. K., & Kumar, M. (2011). How mutual fund investors' objective and subjective knowledge impacts their information search and processing behaviour. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 16, 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1057/fsm.2011.1
24. Mishra, R., & Ahuja, V. (2016). Performance evaluation of Indian mutual funds during bull and bear periods. Indian Journal of Finance, 10(8), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2016/v10i8/99318
25. Mishra, S. K., & Kumar, M. (2012). A comprehensive model of information search and processing behaviour of mutual fund investors. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 17, 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1057/fsm.2012.3
26. Pandey, A. (2021). Growth of mutual fund industries in 21st century its challenges and opportunities (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Allahabad). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/349377
27. Paul, T. (2015). Influence of marketing mix on investors mental accounting with respect to positioning of mutual fund products (Doctoral Dissertation, Assam University). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/101113
28. Prakash, S. (2015). Perception of small investors towards mutual funds: A study with reference to Chennai city (Doctoral Dissertation, SRM University). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/77674
29. Rabika Begum, R. A. (2015). A study on growth of mutual funds with special reference to Chennai (Doctoral Dissertation, Mother Teresa Women's University). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/87911
30. Ramesh, S., Kumar, A. S., & Sayyed, N. (2019). Impact of personality measures and investors' biases on decision-making skills of women investors in mutual funds. Indian Journal of Finance, 13(4), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2019/v13i4/143124
31. Rangwani, R. (2019). A comparative study of portfolio management strategies of mutual funds and investment companies in India (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Rajasthan). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/339307
32. Rehmani, A. (2018). Performance evaluation of select mutual funds: A public-private comparison. Indian Journal of Finance, 12(9), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2018/v12i9/131563
33. Rohit. (2017). Growth and prospects of mutual fund industry in India (Doctoral Dissertation, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/332577
34. Saravanadevi, N. (2015). Perception of individual investors towards mutual fund with special reference to Erode district of Tamil Nadu (Doctoral Dissertation, Periyar University). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/130974
35. Sikh, G. S. (2016). A comparative study of selected mutual funds and insurance products an investor's perspective (Doctoral Dissertation, Sardar Patel University). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/112265
36. Sindhu, Rama Krishna, Y., & Reddy, A. S. (2017). Understanding the relationship between investors' personal attributes and investment perceptions towards mutual fund investments. Indian Journal of Finance, 11(2), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2017/v11i2/110231
37. Singh, N. (2019). A comparative performance study of public sector and private sector mutual funds (Doctoral Dissertation, Shri Jagdishprasad Jhabarmal Tibarewala University). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/294450
38. Sivaprakkash, S. (2018). A comparative study on the movement of Sensex and Nifty on the performance of selected equity mutual funds in India (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Madras). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/225604
39. Snyder, H., Witell, L., Gustafsson, A., Fombelle, P., & Kristensson, P. (2016). Identifying categories of service innovation: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2401–2408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.009
40. Srilakshmi, S. (2016). A study of investors' perception towards mutual fund in Chennai (Doctoral Dissertation, Bharathidasan University). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/224815
41. Subba Rao, P. (2015). Factors affecting investors' perception of mutual fund investment wrt select mutual fund schemes (Doctoral Dissertation, Adikavi Nannaya University, Rajahmundry). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/314465
42. Thiruvasagam, G., & Rajasekar, D. (2017). Customer options in wealth management with reference to mutual funds, Chennai. International Journal of Economic Research, 14(4), 345– 352.
43. Vanipriya, A. R. (2014). Investors' perception and preference towards mutual fund investments with reference to Chennai city (Doctoral Dissertation, Vels University). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/50447
44. Vanja, V. (2018). A comparative study of financial performance of selected Indian and foreign mutual funds in India (Doctoral Dissertation, Anna University). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/226179
45. Vasani, G. H. (2020). Comparative study of financial performance of selected mutual fund companies in India (Doctoral Dissertation, Saurashtra University). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/351053
46. Velmurugan, T. (2018). A study on investor perception of risk and preference in mutual fund investments (Doctoral Dissertation, Bharathiar University). http://hdl.handle.net/10603/299137
47. Yadav, A. P. (2015). The Indian mutual fund industry: From inception to advancement. Indian Journal of Finance, 9(5), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2015/v9i5/71452