New IJF now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member
Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE |
Indian Journal of Finance logo

Indian Journal of Finance

ISSN: 0973-8711 Frequency: Monthly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 2007 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE Group II Google Scholar J-Gate NISCAIR Crossref

Original Article

Open Access Original Article

Performance of Conventional and Sustainable Index in Pre and During the COVID-19 Pandemic : A Comparative Analysis

Manpreet Kaur Makkar1,  Atif Ghayas2,  Nitin Gupta3

1 Research Scholar, Mittal Business School, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara - 144 402, Punjab

2 Assistant Professor, GITAM School of Business, GITAM Deemed to be University, Bengaluru - 561 203, Karnataka

3 Professor and Head, Mittal Business School, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara - 144 402, Punjab

Volume 17
Issue 5
Pages 39–52
Year 2023
Received: July 5, 2022 Accepted: March 5, 2023 Published: March 1, 2023
Abstract

Purpose: There has been a significant increase in the demand for ESG (environmental, social, and governance) investment by investors in recent years. Investors are recognizing that companies that prioritize ESG factors in their operations are more likely to be sustainable and resilient in the long term. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the ESG-responsible firms are performing better than the other firms in the pre-COVID and during the COVID periods. The paper also tried to investigate the impact of COVID-19 cases on the index movement.

Methodology: The study employed the descriptive analysis on the financial data of NSE NIFTY 500 and NIFTY 100 Enhanced ESG index. The EGARCH model was applied to estimate the effect of COVID-19 on the volatility of the NIFTY 100 Enhanced ESG index.

Findings: The results showed that there was no leverage effect in the ESG index in both periods. That means that the ESG Index can act as a cushion during the pandemic period. The ESG Index outperformed the conventional market index, thus acting as a COVID-19 safe asset class. This gives an opportunity to investors and fund managers to diversify their risk by acting sustainably responsible for society.Practical

Implications: This study compared the performance of ESG-indexed firms with that of other firms in the pre-COVID and during COVID time period to check whether there was any difference between them. This study provided empirical evidence for practitioners, policymakers, and academicians in support of ESG investment as it showed that the ESG Index performed better than the conventional index during the COVID period.

Originality: This study used secondary data to study the performance of the EGS firms in the pre and during COVID period in order to compare with the other firms. In the context of India, this study may be the first one to compare the performance of the ESG firms with the normal firms in the pre and during the COVID period.

Keywords COVID-19 pandemic NIFTY 100 CSR ESG sustainable development goals EGARCH return JELClassification Codes
How to Cite

Manpreet Kaur Makkar, Atif Ghayas, Nitin Gupta (2023). Performance of Conventional and Sustainable Index in Pre and During the COVID-19 Pandemic : A Comparative Analysis. Indian Journal of Finance, 17(5), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2023/v17i5/172736

References
  1. Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., Yang, S., & Zhang, C. (2020). Resiliency of environmental and social stocks: An analysis of the exogenous COVID-19 market crash. The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 9(3), 593–621. https://doi.org/10.1093/rcfs/cfaa011
  2. Alsayegh, M. F., Abdul Rahman, R., & Homayoun, S. (2020). Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability, 12(9), 3910. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3910
  3. Andrews, M. A., Areekal, B., Rajesh, K. R., Krishnan, J., Suryakala, R., Krishnan, B., Muraly, C. P., & Santhosh, P. V. (2020). First confirmed case of COVID-19 infection in India: A case report. The Indian Journal of Medical Research, 151(5), 490–492. https://doi.org/10.4103%2Fijmr.IJMR_2131_20
  4. Beloskar, V. D., & Nageswara Rao, S. V. (2023). Did ESG save the day? Evidence from India during the COVID-19 crisis. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 30, 73–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-022-09369-5
  5. Borghesi, R., Houston, J. F., & Naranjo, A. (2014). Corporate socially responsible investments: CEO altruism, reputation, and shareholder interests. Journal of Corporate Finance, 26, 164– 181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.03.008
  6. Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L. T., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716
  7. Carpenter, G., & Wyman, O. (2009). Shedding light on responsible investment: Approaches, returns, impacts. Mercer Investment Consulting. https://www.sustainablefinance.ch/upload/cms/user/Shedding_light_on_responsible_inves tment_free_version.pdf
  8. Demers, E., Hendrikse, J., Joos, P., & Lev, B. (2020). ESG didn't immunize stocks against the COVID-19 market crash. Available at SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3675920
  9. Dey, K., & Brown, A. (2021). Indian stock market's response in five-phases to the COVID-19 pandemic. Indian Journal of Research in Capital Markets, 8(1–2), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.17010/10.17010/ijrcm/2021/v8i1-2/160230
  10. Dey, S. K., & Sharma, D. (2022). Covid-19 and the Indian stock market behaviour: Do government initiatives really matter? Indian Journal of Research in Capital Markets, 9(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijrcm/2022/v9i1/170402
  11. Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005
  12. Ding, W., Levine, R., Lin, C., & Xie, W. (2021). Corporate immunity to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Financial Economics, 141(2), 802–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.03.005
  13. Engelhardt, N., Ekkenga, J., & Posch, P. (2021). ESG ratings and stock performance during the COVID-19 crisis. Sustainability, 13(13), 7133. https://www.mdpi.com/2071- 1050/13/13/7133
  14. Estrada, M. A., Koutronas, E., & Lee, M. (2020). Stagpression: The economic and financial impact of Covid-19 pandemic. Available at SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3593144
  15. Fauzi, H., Mahoney, L. S., & Abdul Rahman, A. (2007). The link between corporate social performance and financial performance: Evidence from Indonesian companies. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 1(1), 149–159.
  16. Ferrell, A., Hao, L., & Renneboog, L. (2016). Socially responsible firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 122(3), 585–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.12.003
  17. Hartzmark, S. M., & Sussman, A. B. (2019). Do investors value sustainability? A natural experiment examining ranking and fund flows. The Journal of Finance, 74(6), 2789–2837. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12841
  18. Hwang, J., Kim, H., & Jung, D. (2021). The effect of ESG activities on financial performance during the COVID-19 pandemic — Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 13(20), 11362. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011362
  19. Jo, H., & Na, H. (2012). Does CSR reduce firm risk? Evidence from controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1492- 2
  20. Kim, S., & Döttling, R. (2020). Sustainability preferences under stress: Mutual fund flows during COVID-19. VOXEU and CEPR. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/sustainabilitypreferences- under-stress-mutual-fund-flows-during-covid-19
  21. Mandelbrot, B. (1963). New methods in statistical economics. Journal of Political Economy, 71(5), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1086/258792
  22. Mangala Minutha, V., & Jagannathan, U. K. (2022). A study on the impact of COVID-19 on alternative investment funds in India. Indian Journal of Research in Capital Markets, 9(2–3), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijrcm/2022/v9i2-3/172551
  23. Miyakoshi, T. (2002). ARCH versus information-based variances: Evidence from the Tokyo stock market. Japan and the World Economy, 14(2), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0922-1425(02)00003-8
  24. Nelson, D. B. (1991). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica, 59(2), 347–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938260
  25. Rasimäki, E. (2021). The market value of ESG during COVID-19 market crash in Europe (Thesis). Aalto University School of Business, Finland.
  26. Rubbaniy, G., Khalid, A. A., Rizwan, M. F., & Ali, S. (2022). Are ESG stocks safe-haven during COVID-19? Studies in Economics and Finance, 39(2), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF- 08-2021-0320
  27. Siew, R. Y., Balatbat, M. C., & Carmichael, D. G. (2013). The relationship between sustainability practices and financial performance of construction companies. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 2(1), 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/20466091311325827
  28. Singh, N. P., Makhija, P., & Chacko, E. (2021). Sustainable investment and the COVID-19 effect - volatility analysis of ESG index. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 13(4), 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSE.2021.118620
  29. Tripathi, V., & Bhandari, V. (2015). Socially responsible stocks: A boon for investors in India. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 12(2), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-03-2014-0021
  30. Tripathi, V., & Kaur, A. (2020). Socially responsible investing: Performance evaluation of BRICS nations. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 17(4), 525–547. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-02-2020-0020
  31. Vadithala, U. K., & Tadoori, G. (2021). Market efficiency of ESG and traditional indices-pre and post COVID analysis of NSE indices. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 9(3), 2712–2726. http://www.ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2103332.pdf
  32. Veeravel, V., Karthikeyan, K., & Remiya, P. R. (2021). Is the Indian stock market affected by COVID-19? : Evidence from cases or fatalities. Indian Journal of Research in Capital Markets, 8(3), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijrcm/2021/v8i3/167957
  33. Vevek, S., Selvam, M., & Sivaprakkash, S. (2022). The persistence of volatility in nifty 50. Indian Journal of Research in Capital Markets, 9(2–3), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijrcm/2022/v9i2-3/172549
  34. Wei-Chong, C., See-Nie, L., & Ung, S. N. (2011). Macroeconomics uncertainty and performance of GARCH models in forecasting Japan stock market volatility. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(1), 200 – 208.
  35. Widya Mitra, A., & Pria Anas, E. (2021). Impact of ESG/corporate social responsibility on company performance before and during covid 19 crisis: Study of listed companies in Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Technology Management, 3(2), 143–155. https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijbtm/article/view/14542
  36. Zhao, X., & Murrell, A. J. (2016). Revisiting the corporate social performance-financial performance link: A replication of Waddock and Graves. Strategic Management Journal, 37(11), 2378–2388. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2579
Editorial Scholar

Submit your Research to IJF

Submit your Manuscript → Author Guidelines