Since time immemorial, women have great propensity to save and invest. If not completely, to a great extent, the socioeconomic status of women has been growing in the positive direction. Obviously, their investment decisions and risk perceptions are also changing positively. Unlike previous studies, the present research aims at understanding the risk perceptions of women exclusively. The main aim of the study is to quantify the risk appetite score of women grouped on various socio-demographic bases. The study is based on the sample survey of 120 women in Mysore city. A questionnaire comprising of a 14-item financial risk-tolerance scale developed by Grable and Lytton (1998) (but slightly modified) was used. Risk appetite score was assigned to each respondent on a 5- point Likert summated scale. The respondents were grouped on the basis of the obtained score. The results show that two-thirds of the respondents were above the average score of risk tolerance. Correlation between investment objective and occupation shows a slightly negative relationship. Correlation between risk appetite score and various independent variables allowed us to have a regression model. The regression model suggests that there is a negative influence of age of women on their risk tolerance levels, a finding which is supported by many studies. Only age and education had a positive influence on the risk appetite of women. The study has great implications for the government and investment industry in framing various policies.

1. Bajtelsmit, V. L., & Bernasek, A. (1996). Why do women invest differently than men? Financial Counseling and Investing, 7(1), 1-10.
2. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001) . Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116 (1), 261-292.
3. Barberis, N., & Thaler, R., (2003). A survey of behavioral finance, in G.M. Constantinides, M. Harris, & R. M. Stulz (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of finance (Vol.1 , Ed. 1, Chapter 18, pp. 1053-1128). Elsevier.
4. Bruce, A., & Johnson, J. E. V. (1994). Male and female betting behavior : New perspectives. Journal of Gambling Studies, 10 (2), 183-198. DOI : 10.1007/BF02109939
5. Bymes, J.P., Miller, D.C., & Schafer, W.D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125 (3), 367-383. DOI : 10.1007/BF02109939
6. Doubleday, W. G. (2002). Expected utility and the cumulative consequences of repeated decisions: A tutorial. Risk, Decision and Policy, 7(2), 109-119. DOI : <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1357530902000546 target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1357530902000546</a>
7. Felton, J., Gibson, B., & Sanbonmatsu, D.M. (2003). Preference for risk in investing as a function of trait optimism and gender. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 4(1), 33-40. DOI:10.1207/S15427579JPFM0401_05
8. Feng, L., & Seasholes, M. S. (2007). Individual investors and gender similarities in an emerging stock market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 16, 44-60. DOI:10.1016/j.pacfin.2007.04.003
9. Flynn, J., Slovic, P., & Mertz, C.K. (1994). Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Analysis, 14(6), 1101-1108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00082.x
10. Grable, J.E., & Lytton, R. H. (1998). Investor risk tolerance: Testing the efficacy of demographics as differentiating and classifying factors. Financial Counseling and Planning, 9 (1), 61-74.
11. Halek, M., & Eisenhauer, J. G. (2001). Demography and risk aversion. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 68 (1), 1 - 24.
12. Hinz, R. P., McCarthy, D. D., & Turner, J. A. (1997). Are women conservative investors? : Gender differences in participant-directed pension investments, in M.S. Gordon, O. S. Mitchell, & M. M. Twinney (Eds.). Positioning pensions for the twenty-first century (pp. 145 - 156). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
13. Jianakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A., (1998). Are women more risk averse? Economic Inquiry, 36 (4), 620-630. DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1998.tb01740.x
14. Johnson, J.E.V., & Powell, P.L. (1994). Decision making, risk and gender: Are managers different? British Journal of Management, 5(2), 123-38. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.1994.tb00073.x
15. Kaushik, S., Kamboj, G., & Kakkar, D. (2013). Trade-Offs between investors' perceptions of risk, returns, service quality, and mutual fund investments. Indian Journal of Finance, 7(12), 27-37.
16. Kover, A. (1999). Okay, women really could use special advice about investing. Fortune, 139(6), 129-132.
17. Lewellen, W. G., Lease, R. C., & Schlarbaum, G. G. (1997). Patterns of investment strategy and behavior among individual investors. Journal of Business, 50 (3), 296-333.
18. Lipe, M. G., (1998). Individual investors' risk judgments and investment decisions: The impact of accounting and market data. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(7), 625-640.
19. Schubert, R. (2006). Analyzing and Managing risk on the importance of gender differences in risk attitudes. Managerial Finance, 32 (9), 706-715. DOI:10.1108/03074350610681925
20. Schumell, D. (1996). Increased focus on women as financial service customers. Trust and Estates, 135( 6), 19-20.
21. Slovic, P. (1966). Risk-taking in children: Age and sex differences. Child Development, 37(1), 169-176. DOI: 10.2307/1126437
22. Sundén, A., & Surette, B. J. (1998). Gender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans. American Economic Review, 88 (2), 207-211.
23. Wang, M.-L., Huang, H.-H., & Ho, S.-H. (2013). Measurement of loss aversion behaviour under prospect theory: Comparison of various kinds of individuals. Indian Journal of Finance, 7(9), 5-15.
24. Yang, J., & Qiu, W. (2005). A measure of risk and a decision-making model based on expected utility and entropy. European Journal of Operational Research, 164 (3), 792-799. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.01.031