This paper analyzed what determined the FDI flow of Korean firms and how characteristics of local market in Latin America affected the performance of Korean corporations. The empirical results of this study showed that it supported the existing theoretical hypothesis. The test to reveal FDI determinants using macro data indicated that FDI flow increased with GDP of host country and economic boom in the United States. The distance appeared to hamper FDI flow as expected in the basic gravity model, with political corruption in the host country acting as another barrier to FDI. The micro data analysis showed that the characteristics of the local market generally had a positive impact on corporate performance, even though the impact varied depending on each characteristic. For instance, factors that were positively related to corporate sales are market access, political stability, potential for growth, distribution networks, the facility of contracting and payment, suitability for FDI, suitability for resource development, and the predictability of the local market ; well-developed infrastructure, the facility of contract and payment, and suitability for resource development positively affected corporate profit.

1. Amal, M., Tombio, B. T., & Raboch, H. (2010). Determinants of foreign direct investment in Latin America. Journal of Globalization, Competitiveness & Governability, 4(3), 116 -133.
2. Blonigen, B. A. (2005). A review of the empirical literature on FDI determinants. Atlantic Economic Journal, 33(4), 383 - 403.
3. Chawla, S., & Sharma, P. (2014). A macroeconomic approach to foreign investment flows in India. Indian Journal of Finance, 8(5), 42 - 49. DOI: 10.17010/ijf/2014/v8i5/71917
4. Chellasamy, P., & Ponsabariraj, N. (2013). Profitability and trend analysis of select retail companies in India. Indian Journal of Finance, 7(12), 19 - 26.
5. Chellasamy, P., & Ponsabariraj, N. (2016). FDI in the retail sector and its impact on select macro - economic variables: A comparative study of India and China. Indian Journal of Finance, 10(6), 24 - 37. doi:10.17010/ijf/2016/v10i6/94876
6. Christmann, P., Day, D., & Yip, G. S. (1999). The relative influence of country conditions, industry structure, and business strategy on multinational corporation subsidiary performance. Journal of International Management, 5(4), 241 - 265.
7. Das, B. (2017). Determinants of FDI into Latin America: An empirical study. DOI: <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3064821 target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3064821</a>
8. De Castro, P. G., Fernandes, A. E., & Campos, A. C. (2013). The determinants of foreign direct investment in Brazil and Mexico: An empirical analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance, 5, 231 - 240.
9. di Giovanni, J. (2005). What drives capital flows? The case of cross-border M&A activity and financial deepening. Journal of International Economics, 65(1), 127-149.
10. Dunning, J. H. (1980). Toward an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1), 9 - 31.
11. Dunning, J. H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible. extensions. Journal of International Business Studies 19(1), 1 - 31.
12. Garcia - Herrero, A., & Santabarbara, D. (2007). Does China have an impact on foreign direct investment to Latin America? China Economic Review, 18(3), 266 - 286.
13. Geringer, J. M., & Herbert, L. (1991). Measuring performance of international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(2), 249 - 263.
14. Godinez, J., & Liu, L. (2015). Corruption distance and FDI flows into Latin America. International Business Review, 24(1), 33 - 42.
15. Hymer, S. H. (1976). The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment. Mass: The MIT Press.
16. Killing, J. P. (1983). Strategies for joint ventures success. New York : Praeger.
17. Kim, Y. G. (2000). A study on localization of international corporations in Asian emerging markets. Research in International Business, 11(2), 141 - 185.
18. Knickerbocker, F. T. (1973). Oligopolistic reaction and multinational enterprise. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Korea Export and Import Bank. (2018). Data. Retrieved from <a href=https://stats.koreaexim.go.kr/main.do target="_blank">https://stats.koreaexim.go.kr/main.do</a>
20. Lee, H., & Kim, H. (2004). International investment location decisions : The case of Korean firms into China. Journal of International Economic Studies, 8(2), 257- 289.
21. Lim, S., & Moon, H. (2001). Effects of outward foreign direct investment on home country exports: The case of Korean firms. Multinational Business Review, 9(1), 42 - 49.
22. Mariotti, S., & Piscitello, L. (1995). Information costs and location of FDIs within the host country: Empirical evidence from Italy. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(4), 815 - 841.
23. Moosa, I. (2002). Foreign direct investment: Theory, evidence and practice. New York : Palgrave.
24. Nunes, L. C., Oscategui, J., & Peschiera, J. (2006). Determinants of FDI in Latin America (Working Paper No. 2006 - 252). Retrieved from <a href=www.pucp.edu.pe/economia/pdf/DDD252.pdf target="_blank">www.pucp.edu.pe/economia/pdf/DDD252.pdf </a>
25. Park, K. (1999). A study on the foreign direct investment of Korean Textile Enterprises. Korean Business Review, 12, 209 - 237.
26. Perlmutter, H. (1969). The tortuous evolution of the multinational enterprise. Columbia Journal of World Business, 4(1), 9 - 18.
27. Ramakrishna, H. (2011). Foreign direct investment in India and China: Some lessons for India. Indian Journal of Finance, 5(12), 4 - 12.
28. Ramirez, M. D. (2010). Economic and institutional determinants of FDI flows to Latin America: A panel study (Working Paper 1003). Dublin : Department of Economics, Trinity College.
29. Ramirez, M. D. (2017). FDI flows to Latin America: A pooled and cointegration analysis, 1980 - 2014. Business and Economic Research, 7(2), 178 - 201.
30. Reddy, M. M. (2016). Impact of FDI on performance of select private sector banks in India. Indian Journal of Finance, 10(3), 52 - 65. doi:10.17010/ijf/2016/v10i3/89024
31. Rugman, A. M. (1981). Inside the multinationals: The economics of internal markets. New York : Columbia University Press.
32. Schneider, F., & Frey, B. (1985). Economic and political determinants of foreign direct investment. World Development, 13(2), 161 - 175.
33. Srinivasan, P. (2010). Causal nexus between foreign direct investment and economic growth in India. Indian Journal of Finance, 4(5), 3 - 9.
34. UNCTAD. (2002). World Investment Report. Retrieved from <a href=https://unctad.org/en/Docs/wir2002overview_en.pdf target="_blank">https://unctad.org/en/Docs/wir2002overview_en.pdf</a>
35. Vernon, R. (1966). International investment and international trade in the product cycle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2), 190 - 207.
36. Wezel, T. (2003). Determinants of German foreign direct investment in Latin American and Asian Emerging Markets in the 1990s (Discussion Paper 11/03). Economic Research Centre of the Deutsche Bundesbank. Retrieved from <a href=https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6ae1/bda33d9ef81902d7f1fe62bc3bb5f3f7fe78.pdf target="_blank">https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6ae1/bda33d9ef81902d7f1fe62bc3bb5f3f7fe78.pdf </a>
37. Wu, H. - L., & Chen, C. - H. (2001). An assessment of outward foreign direct investment from China's transitional economy. Europe-Asia Studies, 53(8), 1235 -1254. Retrieved from <a href=http://www.jstor.org/stable/826269 target="_blank">http://www.jstor.org/stable/826269 </a>